Terrorism and so called religious leaders

Payne as anti-semitic and fascistrespectively, were involved in the Bucharest pogrom and political murders during the s. Ku Klux Klan Klan members conduct a cross burning in

Terrorism and so called religious leaders

Thank you for your faithful readership through the past five years. Over its short run, the Counterterrorism Blog served an important role both as a leading terrorism news and information aggregator and as a site where noted practitioner-experts presented commentary and analysis.

CTB has had a remarkable run, and a tremendous impact — in addition to being visited over 8. As the world has changed and the terrorism community has evolved so has the ability of the volunteer contributing experts on the Counterterrorism Blog to dedicate their time and energy to this enterprise.

In light of this, the Board has made the decision to discontinue publishing here. Thanks again for all the support through the years in making the CTB a leading voice in the Counterterrorism community and for your support and interest.

The Counterterrorism Foundation Board, publishers March 11, But it also did not provide much of an obvious pattern. Libya had, by far the highest unemployment while Tunisia and Egypt although this seems low were more towards the middle of the pack. Tunisia has one of the highest median ages, while Egypt and Libya are again in the middle.

Terrorism and so called religious leaders

In short, the graphic does not point to an obvious next domino, although it does indicate that almost everyone in the region is a possible candidate. But knowing that the nations in the Middle East are ripe for turmoil is hardly news, but the critical questions are when, where, and why.

To model that problem requires a lot more variables. In one of my own efforts to model terrorist group behavior I cited Tolstoy who stated: Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.

Terrorism and so called religious leaders

The same goes for troubles nations and is there any other kind. March 10, By Matthew Levitt Initially slow to react to the string of Jasmine revolutions rocking the Middle East and North Africa, the Obama administration is now proactively engaged in policy and analytical reassessments to determine how to respond to various contingencies arising from the new political horizon rising across the region.

One such internal assessment, completed in mid-February, focused on differences between various types of Islamist movements that promote Islamic law in government. Such a review is timely, commendable, and appears to be asking some of the right questions.

That, however, is no guarantee it will reach the right conclusions. The threshold for partnership cannot simply be that a group is not quite as extreme or violent as al-Qaeda. The full article is available here March 6, The Future of British and U.

Counterradicalization Strategies By Matthew Levitt Radicalization lies at the intersection of grievance and ideology. However, grievances are ever-present and very few individuals choose to act upon them.

Ideology, on the other hand, offers a blueprint for action that mobilizes potential terrorists. A key criticism of the British Prevent strategy has focused on its failure to recognize the importance of ideology in the radicalization process, as evidenced by partnerships with nonviolent Islamist organizations.

Though many of these groups reject violence against the UK itself, they are either silent about or even supportive of attacks against Israel or coalition troops in Iraq. Counterradicalization efforts cannot be effective when partnerships are made with those who explicitly reject liberal values.

And we must not forget that extremist ideology calling for violence in the name of Islam presents the most pressing terrorist threat to the West. Whether advocated by violent or nonviolent extremists, such radical ideology promotes a worldview at odds with the fundamental principles of Western society and must be contested.

American society has a fundamental discomfort with the government dictating acceptable versus unacceptable ideas.

Freedom of speech and religion are arguably the most cherished values in the United States. This position stands in stark contrast with legal and societal norms in the UK or the Netherlands, where distribution of terrorist literature can be investigated and the drafters jailed for creating a threat to national social cohesion.The Muslim leaders try to prevent terrorism through two ways: introducing the real message of Islam which based of mercy and peace.

[BINGSNIPMIX-3

Muslim leaders denounce extremism in different occasions and call the Islamic radical groups like ISIS as a disgrace to Islam. Religious Terrorism Terrorism motivated by an absolute belief that an otherworldly power has sanctioned and commanded the application of terrorist violence for the greater glory of the faith and it is usually conducted in defense of what believers consider to be the one true faith.

“When the masses, the religious leaders, and the political leaders are united to work together for the betterment of our society, we can succeed, Inshaallah,” he said. (Translated from Urdu) Islam today is viewed by many in the West as an aggressive religion that promotes terrorism.

Sadly, it is often the case that the killing of innocent people, suicide bombings, and terrorist activities are carried out by people who claim to be Muslims; however, in reality, the responsibility for such malicious acts actually rests with the so-called .

Mar 02,  · Religious leaders are taking to social media to remember famed Christian evangelist Rev. Billy Graham. Pope Francis has helped to open up spaces for this reflection to occur so that religious leaders are able to contribute to the sensitive debate about religiously motivated terrorism.”.

Why religious leaders might be best at fighting extremism